Here is a chronological and thematically structured overview integrating Dr. Anthony Fauci’s role and connections regarding:
• Gain-of-Function research (GoF)
• mRNA vaccine development
• Relations with the Trump and Biden administrations
• COVID-19 strategy
Before the Pandemic (2011–2019): Preparation, GoF, and Vaccine Platforms
2011–2017: GoF and Pandemic Research
• As director of NIAID (1984–2022), Fauci supported funding of research on zoonotic viruses, including Gain-of-Function.
• In 2012, he defended GoF research in the article “Research on Highly Pathogenic H5N1 Influenza Virus: The Way Forward”, arguing it could be justified to prepare for pandemics.
• Through NIH/NIAID, he funded EcoHealth Alliance, which in turn funded the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) for bat coronavirus research.
• In 2014, the Obama administration paused GoF research, but exemptions were granted by NIH/NIAID for ongoing projects.
2013–2019: mRNA as the Vaccine Platform of the Future
• NIAID initiated collaborations with Moderna starting in 2013 to develop mRNA-based vaccines against MERS, Zika, and influenza.
• By 2017, Fauci became a strong advocate for using mRNA as a pandemic platform: “If you want to get a vaccine quickly, the mRNA platform is the best hope.”
Start of the Pandemic – The Trump Era (2020)
Jan–Mar 2020: Uncertainty and Initial Cooperation
• Fauci initially downplayed the risk: “Risk to Americans is low” (January).
• Meanwhile, he worked behind the scenes to protect research networks: he joined meetings in February 2020 with scientists (e.g., Kristian Andersen) where GoF and a possible lab origin of the virus were discussed.
• He contributed to the editing of “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2”, an article that strongly dismissed the lab-leak theory—despite private emails indicating he was not convinced.
Mar 2020–Jan 2021: Tensions with Trump
• Fauci became a public science figure—praised by the media but frequently clashing with Trump.
• He defended lockdowns and masks, while Trump pushed for reopening.
• At the same time, he directed NIAID’s collaboration with Moderna, which was chosen to rapidly develop an mRNA vaccine using a pre-designed “vaccine plug” for SARS-CoV-2.
• NIAID co-patented key elements of the mRNA vaccine platform alongside Moderna.
The Biden Era (2021–2022): Scientific Influence and Defense
Jan 2021: Fauci Takes on a New Role
• Biden appointed Fauci as his chief medical advisor, giving him significant influence over the pandemic strategy.
• Fauci described it as “liberating” to be able to speak without being “contradicted.”
2021–2022: Centralizing the mRNA Strategy
• Fauci defended mass vaccination with mRNA vaccines, even for children and those previously infected.
• He promoted booster doses, despite criticism from some immunologists and epidemiologists.
• He continued to downplay the possibility of a lab origin for SARS-CoV-2, despite a growing debate.
• NIAID’s ties to Moderna and the mRNA platform deepened—both financially and politically.
Legacy and New Conflicts (2023–2025)
2023: Criticism, Investigations, and NIH Defense
• Congressional investigations and journalistic reports (e.g., The Intercept, Vanity Fair) revealed a lack of transparency in GoF funding.
• Fauci’s earlier role in shaping the narrative away from a possible lab origin came under intense scrutiny.
2024–2025: Political Confrontation and Protection
• Biden issued a preemptive pardon for Fauci in January 2025, shielding him from potential prosecution over pandemic management.
• Trump’s return to office in January 2025 marked a new phase: Fauci’s security detail was removed, and he became a target for political retribution.
• In April 2025, the new Trump administration launched an official COVID website criticizing Fauci, the WHO, and vaccine companies—highlighting the lab-leak theory.
Stay 💪
Anatomy of a genocide